LEXMARK Z65N PRINTER DRIVER

The details in the darkest areas of this image were shown well but the print lacked the photo-quality feel of the Canon S print. The footprint of the Lexmark is reasonably compact and the paper trays and holders fold up well. In fact, the majority of this review would be identical in a Z65 review. The curved design is quite stylish and build quality is good. The Z65n was unveiled with a press release that included such bold statements as 'Photography buffs will appreciate the superb detail and vivid colour'. Automatic print-head alignment is another feature making this printer easy to setup for the first time user. USB, power and network connections are located at the rear.

Uploader:	Zulkim
Date Added:	2 May 2014
File Size:	49.5 Mb
Operating Systems:	Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads:	99091
Price:	Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Also offering extra convenience is the automatic paper-type detection. Those with more confidence in setting up and configuring inkjet printers would be far better off looking at offerings from Canon and Epson.

Testing this for the first time I have to admit I was impressed. By using our service, you agree to our use of cookies. The print status window shows information on the remaining ink and can have its appearance changed through skins. Nikon D Review 3 Nov Join For Free Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.

However these high figures alone don't automatically qualify this as a printer 'Photography buffs' will want to own. The progressive greyscale test showed that on Canon Photo Paper Pro the Z65n is capable of producing the greyscale range well with no 6z5n of a colour cast. The high quality mode produced a shadowed effect, making it far worse than normal mode. priinter

Lexmark Z65n Inkjet Printer Review

Performance Despite the high figures quoted in Lexmark specifications, the majority of prints from the Z65 were slow.

Both colour graphics and photo printing were also very slow. Twin paper trays offer extra convenience.

However despite Lexmarks claims to the contrary, I pginter not feel this is a printer suitable for 'Photography buffs'. Using some ICI satin paper our standard test print showed the Z65 to be capable of producing fine details well but also exhibited poor levels of colour saturation with the print appearing dull.

There are no comments here! Cookies help us deliver our service.

It is a slightly higher featured model than the Z65, adding network printing functionality. This has helped keep the cost of the printers design and development down but compromises the quality of printing possible. Lexmark Z65n in Inkjet Printers.

Lexmark Z65n Inkjet Printer Review

TerryMcK and 59 others liked this. The Z65n was unveiled with a lexjark release that included such bold statements as 'Photography buffs will appreciate the superb detail and vivid lexmaro. The footprint of the Lexmark is reasonably compact and the paper trays and holders fold up well. Can't access your account? What is Plus Membership? In designing this printer Lexmark have looked beyond print quality issues and paid attention to other features users could benefit from.

Also included is an automatic driver updater that connects to the Internet for the latest software. There are commonly used procedures in the 'I want to' menu and you have the option to save settings. Login Join for Free. They are also not cheap, costing around 22 for the black lexmarrk 25 for the colour and they also printed offer a very large capacity. Combined with the high dpi printing this means they won't last long and the printer will be more expensive than average to run.

Overall, despite having easier to spot ink droplets the S produces a more pleasing to the eye print. Visit our Competitions Forum, where you'll find our monthly competition and other external competitions to enter.

Ultimately this printer would be suited to those wanting a small amount of reasonable quality prints with a high level of ease lexmagk use. The text performance of the Z65n was average, with the normal quality mode being reasonably sharp.